Visiting 3D carving
- Xxray
- Vectric Wizard
- Posts: 2304
- Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2011 8:47 am
- Model of CNC Machine: CAMaster Stinger 1
- Location: MI USA
Re: Visiting 3D carving
BTW, for those who perhaps may think I am on about nothing, 3D finish passes typically take hours, sometimes half a day or more depending on size of the project, bit used and stepover. So those who go this route will just about double their cutting time. Thats Ok by me if thats what you want to do, being a curious guy I would just like to know why.
Doug
- martin54
- Vectric Archimage
- Posts: 7339
- Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2012 2:12 pm
- Model of CNC Machine: Gerber 48, Triac PC, Isel fixed gantry
- Location: Kirkcaldy, Scotland
Re: Visiting 3D carving
Set up as has already been said, things like side angle is normally info provided by the manufacturer.BigC wrote:Forgoing if the second roughing pass is necessary or not and just go ahead with perhaps a smaller roughing bit and then use the tapered ball mill.
A question about the tapered ball mill if I may please,
How exactly would I go about setting one of these up (Tapered Ball Mill) in the Tool Database? (*typical newbie question )
and are they a useful bit to have to hand.
I may add one of these bits to my Santa List Many Thanks
Regards
C
As for are they a useful tool, well if you are doing 3D work then I would say yes they are very useful, with some of the 3D stuff I carve I would say they are essential, a small diameter ball nose is so fragile when cutting hardwoods, I have a few different sizes from 0.5mm to 4mm diameter. If your adding to your santa list then you might want to add a couple. Really depends on what sort of thing you are cutting & what size
Re: Visiting 3D carving
Adrian
Many Thanks, Adrian
Regards
C Martin54
"TWO," you say Hmmmm ..As I mainly cut Pine, Oak, Plywood, and MDF at the moment because they are the most accessible for a newbie to get his hands upon what sizes would you suggest for the two that I should buy to cut Pine and Oak 25mm thick or less (cough:: put on the list).
As a newcomer to the hobby side of things I already have ordinary straight BN bits mainly 3 and 6mm so maybe a 0.5 and a 1 or 2mm tBN perhaps?
Please advise
Apologies to the OP for cutting across his thread
Regards
C
I see that nowAdrian wrote:There is a tapered ball nose tool type in the list of tools. Click the Add Tool icon in the bottom left and then choose the Tapered Ball Nose from the dropdown that appears in the dialog.
Many Thanks, Adrian
Regards
C Martin54
Thanks for your reply MartinSet up as has already been said, things like side angle is normally info provided by the manufacturer.
As for are they a useful tool, well if you are doing 3D work then I would say yes they are very useful, with some of the 3D stuff I carve I would say they are essential, a small diameter ball nose is so fragile when cutting hardwoods, I have a few different sizes from 0.5mm to 4mm diameter. If your adding to your santa list then you might want to add a couple. Really depends on what sort of thing you are cutting & what size
"TWO," you say Hmmmm ..As I mainly cut Pine, Oak, Plywood, and MDF at the moment because they are the most accessible for a newbie to get his hands upon what sizes would you suggest for the two that I should buy to cut Pine and Oak 25mm thick or less (cough:: put on the list).
As a newcomer to the hobby side of things I already have ordinary straight BN bits mainly 3 and 6mm so maybe a 0.5 and a 1 or 2mm tBN perhaps?
Please advise
Apologies to the OP for cutting across his thread
Regards
C
-
- Vectric Wizard
- Posts: 594
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:19 pm
- Model of CNC Machine: Xcarve
- Location: Columbus Ohio
Re: Visiting 3D carving
Interesting thoughts and comments here, and I appreciate all of them.
I tried using this process in an effort to get cleaner detail and less wear on the tapered end mill.
I used to do the roughing pass and then go directly to the TBEM
In doing so, I was experiencing greater tool wear and the detail was not as clean due to cutter deflection of the TBEM and or fuzzies
But coming from a tool & die background, we always used and roughing pass, simi finish pass, and then a finial finish pass.
So I thought, why not try it.
When I go to the finial finish pass with the TBEM I may or may not drop the Z ~.005" ( depending on how the simi finish cut looks)
Yes, we are all looking for a faster way to do our machining, and this definitely takes more machine time.
The upside is a more detailed and cleaner (fuzzies) carving, and minimal hand sanding.
For me the extra machine time is worth it and It's now my new process.
In the above deer scene
My roughing pass is with a .25" EM, .06" depth of cut, .06" step over and 100 IPM, Z level
My simi finish pass is with a .25" BEM, .025" step over, 100 IPM, Raster at 45°
My finish pass is with a 4.8° .02" Dia. TBEM .005" step over 100 IPM Raster at 0°
I tried using this process in an effort to get cleaner detail and less wear on the tapered end mill.
I used to do the roughing pass and then go directly to the TBEM
In doing so, I was experiencing greater tool wear and the detail was not as clean due to cutter deflection of the TBEM and or fuzzies
But coming from a tool & die background, we always used and roughing pass, simi finish pass, and then a finial finish pass.
So I thought, why not try it.
When I go to the finial finish pass with the TBEM I may or may not drop the Z ~.005" ( depending on how the simi finish cut looks)
Yes, we are all looking for a faster way to do our machining, and this definitely takes more machine time.
The upside is a more detailed and cleaner (fuzzies) carving, and minimal hand sanding.
For me the extra machine time is worth it and It's now my new process.
In the above deer scene
My roughing pass is with a .25" EM, .06" depth of cut, .06" step over and 100 IPM, Z level
My simi finish pass is with a .25" BEM, .025" step over, 100 IPM, Raster at 45°
My finish pass is with a 4.8° .02" Dia. TBEM .005" step over 100 IPM Raster at 0°
“I've learned so much from my mistakes, I'm thinking of making a few more”
- rscrawford
- Vectric Wizard
- Posts: 1103
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 6:49 pm
- Model of CNC Machine: CAMaster Cobra 408 ATC, ShopSabre IS408
- Location: Wetaskiwin, Alberta
- Contact:
Re: Visiting 3D carving
Jan.vanderlinden wrote:Interesting thoughts and comments here, and I appreciate all of them.
I tried using this process in an effort to get cleaner detail and less wear on the tapered end mill.
I used to do the roughing pass and then go directly to the TBEM
In doing so, I was experiencing greater tool wear and the detail was not as clean due to cutter deflection of the TBEM and or fuzzies
But coming from a tool & die background, we always used and roughing pass, simi finish pass, and then a finial finish pass.
So I thought, why not try it.
When I go to the finial finish pass with the TBEM I may or may not drop the Z ~.005" ( depending on how the simi finish cut looks)
Yes, we are all looking for a faster way to do our machining, and this definitely takes more machine time.
The upside is a more detailed and cleaner (fuzzies) carving, and minimal hand sanding.
For me the extra machine time is worth it and It's now my new process.
In the above deer scene
My roughing pass is with a .25" EM, .06" depth of cut, .06" step over and 100 IPM, Z level
My simi finish pass is with a .25" BEM, .025" step over, 100 IPM, Raster at 45°
My finish pass is with a 4.8° .02" Dia. TBEM .005" step over 100 IPM Raster at 0°
You won't get less wear on your tapered bullnose by using this double finish tool path method. You are still getting wear on the very tip of the tapered ballnose, which is the area you want to remain the sharpest. The rest of the cutter, which you never use anyway, will remain sharp but that is useless anyway when you cut like this since you only ever use the very tip. Cutting wood is VERY different than cutting steel. Often we need to do the exact opposite of what makes sense in milling steel.
If you want to get the least wear on your cutters, you want to be removing enough of a chip size so that you actually cutting instead of simply 'burnishing' the edge. For maximum cutter longevity, you would go straight to a single finish tool path with a tapered ballnose cutter and skip the roughing pass and the first finish tool path.
Now, most people will tell you that skipping the roughing tool path is hard on your tools. But think about what you are actually doing. With a 1/16" tip on a tapered ballnose, at 8% stepover, you are only cutting 0.005" per pass. This does not put any stress on your ballnose, or your machine, even if you are cutting to a depth of 1". The first pass is the only pass that is putting stress on your cutter, so you may want to slow down the first pass, then speed back up for the rest.
What the roughing tool path does (and this is important for some projects) is remove the stresses from your wood before the finish toolpath. It also removes extra material that may get in the way of a short cutting edge on your finish tool path tool, which usually isn't a problem with the tapered ballnose bits because they usually have longer cutter lengths.
Russell Crawford
http://www.cherryleaf-rustle.com
http://www.cherryleaf-rustle.com
Re: Visiting 3D carving
From a newbie standpoint, is it essential that you run a roughing pass as a Z level and the two finishing passes as rasterized?In the above deer scene
My roughing pass is with a .25" EM, .06" depth of cut, .06" step over and 100 IPM, Z level
My simi finish pass is with a .25" BEM, .025" step over, 100 IPM, Raster at 45°
My finish pass is with a 4.8° .02" Dia. TBEM .005" step over 100 IPM Raster at 0°
Regards
C
- Xxray
- Vectric Wizard
- Posts: 2304
- Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2011 8:47 am
- Model of CNC Machine: CAMaster Stinger 1
- Location: MI USA
Re: Visiting 3D carving
Thanks for the insight Jan. I don't want to belabor the point but there is still no technical reason why your method would yield anything other than wasted time. Have you ever done identical projects back to back, one with the extra pass and one without, to validate the claim that you are getting a more precise, cleaner cut ? You can't really gauge bit wear without some very precise measuring tools and even then, it is doubtful that a single project, or even a few, would show any difference at all in bit wear. Best ways to tell if you are pushing past bit capabilities is if you are creating dust and/or smoke. If you aren't then chances are that you don't need to try to fix something that isn't broken. If you are having deflection issues it very likely may be a non rigid machine issue rather than cutting strategy.Jan.vanderlinden wrote:Interesting thoughts and comments here, and I appreciate all of them.
I tried using this process in an effort to get cleaner detail and less wear on the tapered end mill.
I used to do the roughing pass and then go directly to the TBEM
In doing so, I was experiencing greater tool wear and the detail was not as clean due to cutter deflection of the TBEM and or fuzzies
But coming from a tool & die background, we always used and roughing pass, simi finish pass, and then a finial finish pass.
So I thought, why not try it.
When I go to the finial finish pass with the TBEM I may or may not drop the Z ~.005" ( depending on how the simi finish cut looks)
Yes, we are all looking for a faster way to do our machining, and this definitely takes more machine time.
The upside is a more detailed and cleaner (fuzzies) carving, and minimal hand sanding.
For me the extra machine time is worth it and It's now my new process.
In the above deer scene
My roughing pass is with a .25" EM, .06" depth of cut, .06" step over and 100 IPM, Z level
My simi finish pass is with a .25" BEM, .025" step over, 100 IPM, Raster at 45°
My finish pass is with a 4.8° .02" Dia. TBEM .005" step over 100 IPM Raster at 0°
But by all means, keep at it, pleasing yourself is all that matters in this racket and I don't mean to be an ass by being critical of your method. I really just wanted to add some perspective for those with less experience like the OP who might copy your method then get frustrated that cuts take hours and hours and hours more than they had thought.
Doug