A test of How did they do that

This forum is for general discussion about Aspire
User avatar
ohiolyons
Vectric Wizard
Posts: 1706
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 7:16 pm
Model of CNC Machine: Laguna IQ
Location: Kettering, Ohio

A test of How did they do that

Post by ohiolyons »

So I was watchin a FB post from Quint Signs, ( https://fb.watch/7aJY4IaIVt/ ). Watch the video before you try to solve the problem.

They appear to be doing a Profile toolpath on lettering with a model underneath a texture.

So I used a texture from clipart. Added text and converted to vectors.
I did a Roughing and Finish toolpath on the texture only, excluding the text.
I then did a Profile toolpath on the text vectors, zero depth, projected on 3d model.

It works partially, but not like the video.
They do use Aspire.
I have posted a FB comment on how do you do this and they haven't responded yet.

My file https://www.dropbox.com/s/vt4gp5wk0ee3k ... crv3d?dl=0

Don't use my file maybe I approached it the wrong way????
John Lyons
CNC in Kettering, Ohio

User avatar
adze_cnc
Vectric Wizard
Posts: 4364
Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2013 10:08 pm
Model of CNC Machine: AXYZ 4008
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada

Re: A test of How did they do that

Post by adze_cnc »

Project to 3D doesn't make that surface the bottom of the cut but rather the top of the cut, How about a profile toolpath cutting 0.001 inches (0.025 mm) deep—basically no appreciable depth of cut—projected to the 3D?

User avatar
ohiolyons
Vectric Wizard
Posts: 1706
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 7:16 pm
Model of CNC Machine: Laguna IQ
Location: Kettering, Ohio

Re: A test of How did they do that

Post by ohiolyons »

0.001 worked better, but still not the same as on the video.

I'll update if they respond to my FB comment.
John Lyons
CNC in Kettering, Ohio

User avatar
dealguy11
Vectric Wizard
Posts: 2478
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 9:52 pm
Model of CNC Machine: Anderson Selexx 510
Location: Henryville, PA

Re: A test of How did they do that

Post by dealguy11 »

Or even zero depth (zero start depth, zero depth of cut). You don't need any depth to run a profile pass.
Steve Godding
Not all who wander (or wonder) are lost

User avatar
adze_cnc
Vectric Wizard
Posts: 4364
Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2013 10:08 pm
Model of CNC Machine: AXYZ 4008
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada

Re: A test of How did they do that

Post by adze_cnc »

I always worry about the potential for divide by zero errors.

User avatar
ohiolyons
Vectric Wizard
Posts: 1706
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 7:16 pm
Model of CNC Machine: Laguna IQ
Location: Kettering, Ohio

Re: A test of How did they do that

Post by ohiolyons »

dealguy11 wrote:
Wed Aug 04, 2021 11:56 pm
Or even zero depth (zero start depth, zero depth of cut). You don't need any depth to run a profile pass.
I already did that.
John Lyons
CNC in Kettering, Ohio

User avatar
dealguy11
Vectric Wizard
Posts: 2478
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 9:52 pm
Model of CNC Machine: Anderson Selexx 510
Location: Henryville, PA

Re: A test of How did they do that

Post by dealguy11 »

How is it coming out different?
Steve Godding
Not all who wander (or wonder) are lost

Beltramidave
Vectric Wizard
Posts: 528
Joined: Thu May 14, 2015 12:23 am
Model of CNC Machine: FLA Saturn 4x4 / 7W & 60W lasers
Location: Bemidji, MN
Contact:

Re: A test of How did they do that

Post by Beltramidave »

Looking through the Program Options and came across this. Does this effect this question...
Capture1.PNG
Dave
https://lakesedgewoodcraft.com/

User avatar
ohiolyons
Vectric Wizard
Posts: 1706
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 7:16 pm
Model of CNC Machine: Laguna IQ
Location: Kettering, Ohio

Re: A test of How did they do that

Post by ohiolyons »

Turns out
start depth 0.000 cut depth 0.000 project on 3d model
and
start depth 0.000 cut depth 0.001 project on 3d model
yield very similar results
results.jpg
The verticals on the H are not behaving as the video, the vertical on the left side of the E is.

the up and down movement all the curved parts are incorrect too.

In the video the up and down toolpath on the left hand side of E is the way all letters should be.
John Lyons
CNC in Kettering, Ohio

User avatar
ohiolyons
Vectric Wizard
Posts: 1706
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 7:16 pm
Model of CNC Machine: Laguna IQ
Location: Kettering, Ohio

Re: A test of How did they do that

Post by ohiolyons »

And the winner is

DROP TOOL no
drop no.jpg
Thanks for all who helped.
John Lyons
CNC in Kettering, Ohio

Beltramidave
Vectric Wizard
Posts: 528
Joined: Thu May 14, 2015 12:23 am
Model of CNC Machine: FLA Saturn 4x4 / 7W & 60W lasers
Location: Bemidji, MN
Contact:

Re: A test of How did they do that

Post by Beltramidave »

ohiolyons wrote:
Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:44 pm
And the winner is

DROP TOOL no

drop no.jpg

Thanks for all who helped.
Can you explain this more, please??
Dave
https://lakesedgewoodcraft.com/

User avatar
ohiolyons
Vectric Wizard
Posts: 1706
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 7:16 pm
Model of CNC Machine: Laguna IQ
Location: Kettering, Ohio

Re: A test of How did they do that

Post by ohiolyons »

EDIT tab, scroll down to and select Options, then scroll DropTool Under the Toolpaths Settings subheading.

Mine was set to Yes and changed to No

The result now looks like the motion in the video.
IMG_7402.jpg
From the manual
IMG_7403.JPG
John Lyons
CNC in Kettering, Ohio

User avatar
ohiolyons
Vectric Wizard
Posts: 1706
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 7:16 pm
Model of CNC Machine: Laguna IQ
Location: Kettering, Ohio

Re: A test of How did they do that

Post by ohiolyons »

It is actually working exactly opposite of what the manual states with my limited understanding.

I think I know what the toolpath means, but what is the project. Is it the model? How does the project and model differ?

I just know it looks like the video when you set it to No.
John Lyons
CNC in Kettering, Ohio

User avatar
adze_cnc
Vectric Wizard
Posts: 4364
Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2013 10:08 pm
Model of CNC Machine: AXYZ 4008
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada

Re: A test of How did they do that

Post by adze_cnc »

"Project" as a verb not a noun.
When projecting a toolpath on the model, drop the tool on the surface rather than project.
would better be written as:
When projecting a toolpath on the model, drop the tool on the surface rather than project the tool to the surface.
Even that is confusing without an understanding of what the real difference between "drop" and "project" is. i.e. in one case you are "projecting by dropping" and in the other you are "projecting by projecting".

User avatar
scottp55
Vectric Wizard
Posts: 4716
Joined: Thu May 09, 2013 11:30 am
Model of CNC Machine: ShopbotDesktop 5.5"Z/spindle/VCP11.5
Location: Kennebunkport, Maine, US

Re: A test of How did they do that

Post by scottp55 »

Still confusing to me, but saved that manual clip to desktop so I can play with it and preview the cuts.
Might come in handy, but never would have run across it myself!
Thanks!!
scott
I've learned my lesson well. You can't please everyone,so you have to please yourself
R.N.

Post Reply