dealguy11 wrote:That's really cool. I'm curious about the choice of foam for this base rather than brick and concrete. Was there a significant cost difference? Was there a weight concern?
mtylerfl wrote:Well, that's an interesting concept! You would think that a concrete base would be "an innocent bystander" in any case if a car hits it!
The so-called liability of someone hitting a stationary object gets funnier the more I think about it!
"Yes, Your Honor, I did hit the monument base while I was texting my girlfriend. But look at the damage that it caused to my car! It's the city's fault for not making the base out of foam!"
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Yahoo [Bot] and 12 guests