mtylerfl wrote:Well, yes - Offset strategy never had the “jumping around” issue. Only Raster had/has.
The version 10 has implemented some new calculations for reducing “jumps” when Raster strategy is used. In my own testing, some Raster carve “jumps” are indeed reduced or eliminated, others not so much.
Many variables, including overall shape, the amount of Boundary Offset, stepover setting, ...
Do you mind sending us some of your files where new raster is not so successful? Ideally with some remarks on what would you expect. That would really help us making it better.
Thanks for pointing me to the Faucet Foto Frame project. I can see what the issue is and it gave me some ideas, now I just need some time to try those out.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 25 guests