mohamed wrote:I don't think extending the density range will be a problem, I'll add to our list for a discussion with the team.
Regarding the use of ball nose, what is the idea behind that just so we can get an understanding of the use case?
JickyJay wrote:I have the same sort of question. The selection I noticed was that in V10 the densest line spacing is 100% ..... but in PhotoVCarve it can be much denser, up to 200% (which can give much better results).
I suppose upgrading V10 to the functionality of PhotoVCarve would in effect make PhotoVCarve obsolete - Is that the problem?
Jhodge76 wrote:If the line density is increased and ballnose bits are an option then you could create lithophanes in V10, and with the vector toolpath option there could be ripple effects in them and text boxes like in the video she did with the wood.
Users browsing this forum: dakotablue and 9 guests