I am trying to make a wood printing block. I have a drawing of a shell, exported from photoshop as jpg (shell line test.jpg). When I bring that into vcarve, use the trace option and create a pocket toolpath, that appears to show a consistent width line in the shape I want (see toolpath.png). But when I run the job, the line width varies greatly (see block.jpg).
What is the correct or best way to get a consistent raised line 1/16 thick in any shape that I want?
Thanks for your help.
creating a complex raised outline of object
creating a complex raised outline of object
- Attachments
-
- shell 1 wide on right when carved.zip
- (1.52 MiB) Downloaded 121 times
-
- Vectric Wizard
- Posts: 1592
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 2:59 pm
- Model of CNC Machine: Custom DIY
- Location: Lake St Clair, MI, USA
- Contact:
Re: creating a complex raised outline of object
My guess is that your machine lost steps at some point, as the toolpaths look fine.
Gerry - http://www.thecncwoodworker.com
Re: creating a complex raised outline of object
I dont think that is the case. This is the second time it has happened. I created a new job, with a smaller size, for examples shown. The first run had the same result as this one.
Is there a way to draw a single vector and designate it as the high point as opposed to multiple vectors with unmachined space between them?
Is there a way to draw a single vector and designate it as the high point as opposed to multiple vectors with unmachined space between them?
- Adrian
- Vectric Archimage
- Posts: 14660
- Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 2:19 pm
- Model of CNC Machine: ShopBot PRS Alpha 96x48
- Location: Surrey, UK
Re: creating a complex raised outline of object
If the cutout doesn't match the preview then your machine is flexing or the bit is flexing or the control software is incorrectly configured or an axis is binding and losings steps or an axis is hitting its limits and losing steps or the feedrate is too high or the pass depth is too deep etc etc etc.
Basically the issue is downstream of your vectors and toolpaths. Changing the vectors isn't going to solve the fundamental issue of your results not matching the preview. Looks like you're using a single bit rather than a clearance tool and detail bit. How big is the actual piece? What size bits are you using?
Basically the issue is downstream of your vectors and toolpaths. Changing the vectors isn't going to solve the fundamental issue of your results not matching the preview. Looks like you're using a single bit rather than a clearance tool and detail bit. How big is the actual piece? What size bits are you using?