I am trying to make a very simple text engraving. I'm using an Amana 1/16" tapered ballnose bit (#46282). Start depth is 0.0 in. Flat depth is 0.15in
However, when I hover over the toolpath that has been created the maximum depth is shown as 0.0081 in. When I run it on the machine the bit barely scratches the surface of the practice piece. I'm using 4/4 maple if it matters.
VCarve 8.5 engraving toolpath
- Rcnewcomb
- Vectric Archimage
- Posts: 5928
- Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 5:54 am
- Model of CNC Machine: 24x36 GCnC/WinCNC with ATC
- Location: San Jose, California, USA
- Contact:
Re: VCarve 8.5 engraving toolpath
Are you selecting the Quick Engraving Toolpath, or the V-carve toolpath, or some other toolpath?
If you can post the CRV file that would be best.
If you can post the CRV file that would be best.
- Randall Newcomb
10 fingers in, 10 fingers out, another good day in the shop
10 fingers in, 10 fingers out, another good day in the shop
- adze_cnc
- Vectric Wizard
- Posts: 4380
- Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2013 10:08 pm
- Model of CNC Machine: AXYZ 4008
- Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Re: VCarve 8.5 engraving toolpath
I think it matters more that you're trying to do a text engraving with a ball-end (albeit tapered) bit. Getting any depth and definition to the cuts will be difficult depending on the size of the text.btbcobb wrote:I'm using 4/4 maple if it matters.
- sharkcutup
- Vectric Wizard
- Posts: 2928
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 3:48 pm
- Model of CNC Machine: Shark HD3 Pro Extended Bed with Spindle
- Location: U.S.A.
Re: VCarve 8.5 engraving toolpath
Without a copy of your posted file here on this forum we all are just guessing at the various possibilities of your problem!
Please post/upload your .crv file here to the forum.
Sharkcutup
Please post/upload your .crv file here to the forum.
Sharkcutup
V-Carve Pro Tips, Gadget Tips & Videos
YouTube Channel - Sharkcutup CNC
V-Carve Pro 12.005
YouTube Channel - Sharkcutup CNC
V-Carve Pro 12.005
Re: VCarve 8.5 engraving toolpath
Thank You all for your replies
I think I have discovered the problem. I didn't know that entering a value for the Flat Depth defaulted to a certain depth.
I zeroed the Flat Depth then entered a non zero value in Start Depth. I then changed the tool cutting parameters to half of the Start depth.
This seems to have solved my problem.
ADZ What tool would you recommend?
Thanks again for your help!
I think I have discovered the problem. I didn't know that entering a value for the Flat Depth defaulted to a certain depth.
I zeroed the Flat Depth then entered a non zero value in Start Depth. I then changed the tool cutting parameters to half of the Start depth.
This seems to have solved my problem.
ADZ What tool would you recommend?
Thanks again for your help!
- Adrian
- Vectric Archimage
- Posts: 14683
- Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 2:19 pm
- Model of CNC Machine: ShopBot PRS Alpha 96x48
- Location: Surrey, UK
Re: VCarve 8.5 engraving toolpath
You should have the start depth as zero. The actual cut depth on a Vcarve/engraving toolpath is set by the combination of the distance between the vectors (the individual letters) and the angle of the bit. Making the letters bigger will cut deeper as will using a more acute angle bit. The flat depth only comes into play if it's less than the actual cut depth that would be reached without it.
Because you've told the toolpath to start below the surface of the material you are now getting more cut depth. With a small ball nose you'll get away with that but with a v-bit you would end up with the letters merging into each other.
For text that small I would use a profile toolpath with single line text rather than a VCarve/engraving toolpath.
Because you've told the toolpath to start below the surface of the material you are now getting more cut depth. With a small ball nose you'll get away with that but with a v-bit you would end up with the letters merging into each other.
For text that small I would use a profile toolpath with single line text rather than a VCarve/engraving toolpath.
- adze_cnc
- Vectric Wizard
- Posts: 4380
- Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2013 10:08 pm
- Model of CNC Machine: AXYZ 4008
- Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Re: VCarve 8.5 engraving toolpath
First: you mentioned in the original post that you were using an Amana #46282 tapered ball-end bit. Your toolpaths, though, are trying to use a 1/16" straight ball-end bit. It doesn't help much, though, to change to a real 5.4 degree 1/16 dia tapered ball-end bit.btbcobb wrote:ADZe What tool would you recommend?
Second: if you're going to do a "v-carve/engraving" toolpath how about using a v-bit? Duplicate your "VCarve 4" toolpath. Get rid of the start depth of 0.05", deselect flat depth check box, and for the tool select, say, a 60 deg v-bit and see how you like the result. (Looked great when I tried it).
Third: to double-check---the "Joe Megan05" is using a different typeface (more script-like) than "VCarve 4" (sans serif and very upright). Which one were you thinking of using? The v-bit with the script typeface would also look nice.
Steven
Re: VCarve 8.5 engraving toolpath
Steven,
Thanks for the suggestions and insight into the process. I find the the tutorials to be helpful to a degree. What I really find annoying is the messages I get when something is not set correctly. I understand every word in the sentence but have no context do understand what is wrong. I tried the v-bit as you suggested. I like it as well. I will try it out tomorrow. I am leaning towards the script font as well.
Thanks again for you assistance.
Brad
Thanks for the suggestions and insight into the process. I find the the tutorials to be helpful to a degree. What I really find annoying is the messages I get when something is not set correctly. I understand every word in the sentence but have no context do understand what is wrong. I tried the v-bit as you suggested. I like it as well. I will try it out tomorrow. I am leaning towards the script font as well.
Thanks again for you assistance.
Brad
Re: VCarve 8.5 engraving toolpath
Adrian,
Thanks for the suggestions. I agree that the profile tool pass is simpler to work with.
Thanks for your explanation of how different factors contribute to how depth of cut is determined by the software.
It was a mystery to me.
Thanks, Brad
Thanks for the suggestions. I agree that the profile tool pass is simpler to work with.
Thanks for your explanation of how different factors contribute to how depth of cut is determined by the software.
It was a mystery to me.
Thanks, Brad