I have to cut out two different sets of 70 objects that fit into a 2" x 2" space. I can get good layout density with seven rows of 10 parts on 1/4" plywood. The problem is holding the parts in the stock during cutting. We have used double sided tape, put that tends to creep with a lot of milling. Tabs are better, but I'm not experienced with them, especially in such an array. I cannot seem to find any rules, guidelines, or suggestions on how much wood has to be around the part to which the tab is attached. There is enough wood to screw down the sheet at 6" intervals, so that seems okay to me.
So, with the best part array density, a row of 10 parts fit across a 24" sheet with only cut lines between parts. Can I attach parts within a row with a tab? (Think of it as joined nose to tail.) The sides would be attached to a strip between each row of parts. Every other one of these strips could be screwed down to the spoil board. Any suggestions, guidelines as to the width of this strip or general methods?
If there are guidelines out there for tabs in an array already, I'd appreciate a pointer to them.
Lastly, in a related topic, can you array parts with tab positions defined, so that I don't have to move the tabs that don't go where I want them to on 150 parts.
Thanks.
Tabs in tight object arrays
-
- Vectric Wizard
- Posts: 447
- Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2014 1:49 pm
- Model of CNC Machine: FMT Patriot 4 x8
Re: Tabs in tight object arrays
If you create one iteration of your part(s) then toolpath it and place your tabs where you want then go back and array the part. Your tabs will be created in the same place.
I can't remember whether it is necessary to associate vectors with the toolpath (Vector Selection) but I would for any complex layout. When you recalculate toolpath the tabs should all be in the same place.
I can't remember whether it is necessary to associate vectors with the toolpath (Vector Selection) but I would for any complex layout. When you recalculate toolpath the tabs should all be in the same place.
- adze_cnc
- Vectric Wizard
- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2013 10:08 pm
- Model of CNC Machine: AXYZ 4008
- Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Re: Tabs in tight object arrays
Four square inches for 70 objects?---I'm impressed. I'd 3D-print them instead. Or is this a "Spinal Tap" 18-inch tall instead of an 18-foot tall Stonehenge model moment?PLLman wrote:70 objects that fit into a 2" x 2" space. I can get good layout density with seven rows of 10
-
- Vectric Wizard
- Posts: 1013
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 1:10 pm
- Model of CNC Machine: 3 axis small size machine
- Location: France
Re: Tabs in tight object arrays
Steven,
That's what I read the first time. But it seems it is the size of one part as the op writes "a row of 10 parts fit across a 24" sheet".
That's what I read the first time. But it seems it is the size of one part as the op writes "a row of 10 parts fit across a 24" sheet".
Best regards
Didier
W7 - Aspire 8.517
Didier
W7 - Aspire 8.517
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 12:26 am
- Model of CNC Machine: Shopbot 4 x 4
- Location: Granite Bay, CA
Re: Tabs in tight object arrays
Yes, the individual part is 2" x 2".
Thanks, tomgardiner. Your trick worked a charm. I can set the tabs on one part and then array it and keep the tabs where they were placed on the single part.
Now all I need is some direction on how small the "web" of wood can be around an array and if parts can be tabs to other parts, at least on one direction.
Thanks, tomgardiner. Your trick worked a charm. I can set the tabs on one part and then array it and keep the tabs where they were placed on the single part.
Now all I need is some direction on how small the "web" of wood can be around an array and if parts can be tabs to other parts, at least on one direction.
-
- Vectric Wizard
- Posts: 447
- Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2014 1:49 pm
- Model of CNC Machine: FMT Patriot 4 x8
Re: Tabs in tight object arrays
You may not need to leave a web between parts, only around perimeter. If you place your tabs so their position is the same left/right and top/bottom then you might be able to array your parts only a small amount larger than your bit diameter. I nest at a .40" for a 3/8" bit. If the tabs are side by side cutting one part will not obliterate the tabs of others. Selection order may be important to reduce the stress on the complete sheet.